**JEE Advanced 2019 Paper 1, Question 6**

A conducting wire of parabolic shape, initially , is moving with velocity in a non-uniform magnetic field , as shown in the figure below. If and are positive constants and is the potential difference developed between the ends of the wire, then the correct statement(s) is/are:

- for .
- for .
- remains the same if the parabolic wire is replaced by a straight wire, initially, of length .
- is proportional to the length of the wire projected on the axis.

**Related Problems:**

Electromagnetic induction in a twisted loop

Terminal velocity in a magnetic field

Electric flux through a hemisphere

**Discussion**

Here is a warm up problem that you can try first. It involves the same basic concept but the calculation is easier:

A thin wire shaped as a semi-circle of diameter rotates with a constant angular velocity in a uniform magnetic field of strength with parallel to . The rotation axes passes through the end of the wire and is perpendicular to the plane of the wire. Find . What happens if AC has an arbitrary shape?

Answer: . You should be able to find this result *without* doing any integrals.

**Solution**

Let us first try to get a physical picture of the given situation. As the wire moves through the magnetic field the electrons in the wire experience a force

(1)

The force pushes negative charges toward one end of the wire, leaving the other end positively charged. This goes on until the separated charges themselves cause an electric field such that, everywhere in the interior of the wire,

(2)

Then the motion of the electrons relative to the wire ceases. The potential difference between the ends of the rod is just the integral this electric field,

(3)

where we have used (2) in the second equation and (1) in the third one. Here, is an infinitesmal length element on the wire and the integral is computed from one end of the wire to the other. We can plug in the given expressions for and , do some geometry to find the dot product and integrate this expression over the length of the wire to find . However, that method is cumbersome and time consuming. There is a simpler way to find as hinted in option (D) of the problem.

We begin by recalling *Faraday’s law* of induction:

*If the magnetic field in a given frame of motion is constant in time, then for a loops of any shape moving in any manner, the emf around the loop is related to the magnetic flux through the loop by*

(4)

Notice that this applies to **loops**. In our problem we have an open wire, not a closed loop. So we need to add wires along and , as shown below, to form a loop.

Next, we notice that the magnetic field does not depend on the coordinate.

If we consider a thin region inside the loop at some height (the hashed region in \figref{fig:q6flux}) we find that the magnetic flux through this region is where , is the area of the strip. This flux does not change as the loop slides along in the direction. Breaking down the whole area inside the loop into a large number of such thin regions we find that the total magnetic flux through the loop does not change with time! Therefore the total emf around this loop, .

The emf is the total change in potential around the loop,

(5)

However, using (3),

since an length element on the segment is parallel to the velocity . Therefore,

(6)

where we have used (5) and (3) in the first and second equations respectively. At this point we can conclude that option (D) is correct. Option (C) is also correct since, if we replaced by a straight wire of length along , we would get the same segment if we closed the loop as we have done above.

This integral in (6) is easy to evaluate since and are mutually perpendicular to one another,

(7)

Subsituting shows us that option (A) is incorrect but (B) is correct.

The correct answers are (B), (C), (D).