This article reviews Archimedes’ principle and elaborates on the idea with three fully solved examples. The reader is encouraged to attempt the problems on their own before checking the solution.

Consider a container of fluid at *rest*, as shown in the figure below. Since the fluid is at rest the net force on any part of the fluid is zero. Let us draw an imaginary boundary around some region of the fluid, as shown in the figure. This parcel of fluid has a weight , where is the density of the fluid and is the volume of the parcel. The parcel does not fall through the fluid under its weight because the fluid *around* the parcel exerts an upward force, called the **buoyant** force , on the parcel which counteracts its weight. That is, .

Now imagine we somehow swap out the parcel of liquid with an object of exactly the same shape and size, as in container . The surrounding fluid is not affected by what is inside the parcel, which means it exerts the same buoyant force on it as before. This is **Archimedes principle**:

(1)

What about the weight of the object in container ? There are three possibilities, depending on how the average density of the object compares to that of the fluid, :

- : The object is heavier than the parcel of fluid it displaces since . Therefore, and the object sinks to the bottom since the buoyant force is insufficient to hold it up.
- : The buoyant force balances the weight of the object exactly, , and the object remains fully submerged.
- : In this case a smaller volume of liquid needs to be displaced to balance the weight of the object, which means the object is only partially submerged (that is, it floats) as shown in figure. Then,

(2)

where is the total volume of the object, and is the volume of its submerged portion, which is also the volume of the liquid it displaces.

With that, we can move on to discuss some examples.

## Example 1: Suspended between oil and water

**(a)** An object of uniform density is placed in a vessel containing water and oil as shown in the figure below. The object is suspended between the two liquids such that three quarters of its volume is submerged in water and the rest is in contact with the oil. What is the density of the object? Use and .

**Solution:** Using Archimedes’ principle the buoyant force is

(3)

Since the object does not touch the bottom of the vessel its weight must equal . This leads us to conclude

(4)

**(b)** In the preceding discussion we argued that the buoyant force is an *upward* force exerted by the fluid on the object. So here is a question: if there is no oil beneath the object, how does it exert a force on the object in the upward direction?

**Solution:** The oil exerts force on the object by applying its own weight on the water. To see this explicitly we can take examine the origin of the buoyant force from a slightly different perspective. We know that the pressure on the top face of the object is and that at the bottom face is (see figure below). Since the object has a uniform cross-sectional area throughout we find the net upward force to be

(5)

This is just the buoyant force we found in (3). But now we understand how the pressure from the oil manifests as an upward force on the object. If the same object were placed in a vessel with water alone, of it’s volume would be below the water surface, whereas with oil present only of the object is submerged in water.

## Example 2: Melting ice

**(a)** A block of ice floats in a vessel containing water. After a while the ice completely melts. The water level in the vessel will

- rise
- fall
- remain the same

**Solution:** The weight of the ice must be the same as the weight of liquid displaced, . When the ice melts it turns into water with volume . In other words, it fills up exactly the volume that the ice had displaced before it melted. So the water level remains the same.

**(b)** A similar ice cube floats in a vessel containing **salt** water. When the ice melts completely, the water level will (*Hint:* Salt water is denser than pure water.)

- rise
- fall
- remain the same

**Solution:** Here we have . However, the ice melts into a volume . Since , we find which means the water level rises. This is why sea levels rise due to melting of the polar ice caps — the ice is mostly pure water whereas the ocean is salinated.

## Example 3: The weight of buoyancy

**(a)** Two identical beakers rest on weight scales and are filled with water. Beaker has an iron sphere submerged in it, that is also connected to the ceiling by a taut string as shown in the figure. The water level is the same in both beakers. If the scales measure weights and , which of the following is true?

**Solution:** The volume of the water displaced by the iron sphere in exerts an upward buoyant force on the sphere. The remaining force to hold the sphere in place comes from the tension of the string. By Newton’s law the reaction to is exerted on the liquid, and becomes part of weight we read off from the scale. But this is the same weight we would read off from since the volume in that case is filled with water itself. So .

**(b)** Next, a wooden block floats in a similar beaker, call it , such that the water level is still . How does the weight compare with from the previous problem?

**Solution:** The scale reads the weight of the water plus the weight of the wooden block. That is, , where is the volume of water in the beaker. But the weight of the block is balanced by the buoyant force exterted by water on the block, which is nothing by the weight of the displaced water ( is the volume of the block below the water surface). Therefore . In beaker we can imagine a parcel of water of volume in place of the submerged part of the block in . This tells us .

**(c)** Finally, a wooden block is tied down to bottom of the beaker , such that the water level is . How does the weight compare with ?

**Solution:** If the volume occupied by the wooden block were filled with water, as in the total contents of the beaker would be heavier. That means . The tension in the string makes up for the excess upward force so that .